Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Five distinct α,α′-bis(arylimino)-2,3:5,6-bis(hexamethylene)pyridine-cobalt(II) chloride complexes, [2,3:5,6-{C 5 H 10 C(NAr)} 2 C 5 HN]CoCl 2 (Ar = 2,6-Me 2 C 6 H 3 , Co1; 2,6-Et 2 C 6 H 3 , Co2; 2,6-i-Pr 2 C 6 H 3 , Co3; 2,4,6-Me 3 C 6 H 2 , Co4; 2,6-Et 2 -4-MeC 6 H 2 , Co5), have been synthesized by one-pot template reaction of α,α′-dioxo-2,3:5,6-bis(hexamethylene)pyridine with the corresponding aniline and cobalt(II) chloride in acetic acid. The molecular structures of Co2 and Co3 reveal distorted square pyramidal geometries with two conformationally flexible eight-membered rings, a feature of the ligand manifold. On activation with either methylaluminoxane (MAO) or modified MAO (MMAO), all five complexes displayed high catalytic activities for ethylene polymerization (up to 3.62 × 10 6 g PE mol -1 (Co) h -1 ) generating strictly linear polyethylenes with the activity decreasing in the orders: Co4 > Co5 > Co1 > Co2 > Co3 (MAO) and Co1 > Co4 > Co2 > Co5 > Co3 (MMAO). Moreover, the nature of the aluminoxane cocatalyst employed had a marked effect on the molecular weight and distribution (M w /M n ) of the polymeric material obtained. For example using MAO, high molecular weight polyethylene (M w ≈ 10 5 g mol -1 ) with a narrow monomodal molecular weight distribution (2.1-3.6) was a characteristic, while using MMAO, the polyethylene was of lower molecular weight (M w ≈ 10 4 g mol -1 ) and exhibited a mono- to bimodal distribution (10.1-23.8) depending on the ratio of MMAO employed, temperature, and run time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: