Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines the place of critical inquiry within law and society studies. It suggests that such inquiry requires a periodic reexamination of both methodological and theoretical assumptions. In terms of method, critical inquiry would emphasize the particular and intensive as opposed to the general and extensive. In terms of theory, it calls attention to the limits of state legality and invites attention to ordinary social transactions in which the law appears invisible but is nonetheless powerful. The authors argue that it is possible to be both critical and empirical.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silbey et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: