PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2005The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America208 citationsOpen Access

Informational masking of speech in children: Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters

View Full Paper
FWFrederic L. WightmanNorthwestern UniversityDKDoris J. KistlerGoogle (United States)

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Using a closed-set speech recognition paradigm thought to be heavily influenced by informational masking, auditory selective attention was measured in 38 children (ages 4-16 years) and 8 adults (ages 20-30 years). The task required attention to a monaural target speech message that was presented with a time-synchronized distracter message in the same ear. In some conditions a second distracter message or a speech-shaped noise was presented to the other ear. Compared to adults, children required higher target/distracter ratios to reach comparable performance levels, reflecting more informational masking in these listeners. Informational masking in most conditions was confirmed by the fact that a large proportion of the errors made by the listeners were contained in the distracter message(s). There was a monotonic age effect, such that even the children in the oldest age group (13.6-16 years) demonstrated poorer performance than adults. For both children and adults, presentation of an additional distracter in the contralateral ear significantly reduced performance, even when the distracter messages were produced by a talker of different sex than the target talker. The results are consistent with earlier reports from pure-tone masking studies that informational masking effects are much larger in children than in adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wightman et al. (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03ae2d2ef79526a5a9c4c4https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2082567
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper