Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic modeling reveals structural errors impairing frequency tracking in MEMS ring gyroscopes, indicating a need for parameter identification.
This paper presents a unified dynamic-modeling and error-analysis framework for an FTR (force-to-rebalanced)-operated MEMS ring gyroscope. Starting from an equivalent mass-point representation of the ring resonator, a dynamic model including stiffness and damping errors is first established. Principle-related inertial-acceleration errors and structural errors are then analyzed within the same framework. The results show that, under practical rate-measurement conditions, inertial-acceleration errors have negligible effects on both the drive and sense modes. In contrast, structural errors, including modal-frequency perturbation, damping-decay-time mismatch, mass-distribution mismatch, and electrode angular misalignment, impair drive-mode amplitude control and frequency tracking, introduce in-phase bias components into the sense-mode output, and produce quadrature signals through frequency coupling. The analysis further indicates that electrostatic mode matching should be implemented in two steps: quadrature-stiffness correction followed by modal-frequency tuning. The proposed model provides a concise and physically transparent basis for resonator design, parameter identification, and control compensation in high-performance MEMS ring gyroscopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: