Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observations on coordination with subject gaps reveal implications for asymmetric syntactic structures.
German features a special coordinate structure in which the second conjunct contains a subject gap, resulting in the asymmetric coordination of a verb-second clause and a verb-initial clause. In this paper, coordination with subject gaps is compared with normal phrasal coordination. Both types of coordination show asymmetries between the conjuncts, including the occupation of the clause-initial position, the omission of non-subject elements, the scope of adverbial constituents, asymmetric extraction and the events described in the conjuncts are naturally connected. Observing the similarities between them in terms of structure and interpretation, I argue that coordinate structures share a unified asymmetric syntactic structure, and coordination with a subject gap is derived from phrasal coordination with a shared subject in the sentence-initial position. The fronted non-subject constituent in the coordination with a subject gap is the result of asymmetric extraction from the first conjunct to the sentence-initial specifier position, which is licensed by its differentiated information structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeming Xu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: