This framework assesses operational benefits in virtual power plants, indicating key factors like environmental impact and Game Theory applications.
Different types of Virtual Power Plants (VPPs) play distinct roles within power systems. To scientifically evaluate the operational benefits of VPPs, this paper constructs a comprehensive evaluation framework based on combined weighting and the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) method. First, an evaluation index system is established encompassing four dimensions: economic, environmental, social, and technical. Subsequently, a hybrid model integrating DEMATEL, CRITIC, Game Theory, and EDAS is proposed. Specifically, the DEMATEL method is employed to analyze the causal relationships among indicators and determine subjective weights, while the CRITIC method is used to calculate objective weights. Game Theory is then applied to optimize the combination of weights, and the EDAS method is utilized to rank the alternatives. Empirical analysis of five VPP scenarios indicates that the renewable energy accommodation rate and hardware investment costs are the core driving factors affecting operational benefits. Specifically, the renewable-energy accommodation rate exhibits the highest combined weight of 0.08, and the hardware investment cost reaches 0.07. Among the scenarios, a wind-solar-storage hybrid VPP demonstrates the optimal comprehensive performance. The results are consistent with comparative methods such as TOPSIS, verifying the reliability of the proposed framework and providing a scientific reference for VPP investment decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: