Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals treatment patterns for metastatic urothelial cancer, indicating a need for improved first-line therapy adoption.
INTRODUCTION: Treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) is evolving in Europe. In 2022, ESMO guidelines recommended avelumab as first-line (1L) maintenance for la/mUC in patients who did not progress on platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and, in March 2024, recommended enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab as the preferred 1L therapy. This study assessed treatment patterns for mUC between December 2023-May 2024. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World mUC Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of physician-reported data across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. RESULTS: = 238) reported data for 1622 patients. PBC was the predominant 1L treatment, administered to 74% (1201/1622)) of patients, while 20% (326/1622) received nonchemotherapy monotherapy. Overall, 2% (31/1622) of patients received EV at 1L (monotherapy/combination). Avelumab was administered to 10% (160/1622) of patients as 1L therapy, 14% (234/1622) as maintenance, and 3% (55/1622) as second-line (2L) therapy (monotherapy/combination). At data collection, 19% (302/1622) patients had received 2L treatment, of whom 25% (74/302) received EV monotherapy and 21% (63/302) pembrolizumab monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with guidelines, adoption of avelumab maintenance was occurring, although its usage remained limited. Low rates of 2L+ therapies highlight the importance of 1L treatment selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: