Consciousness studies typically treats emotion as a feature of an already-formed subject. This paper argues the reverse: emotion is part of how the subject comes into being. The argument develops through a four-stage progression: general differentiation, emotional differentiation, saturation, and pinch point. At saturation, distributed emotional differentiation gives way to a new differentiating structure: the self as interiority differentiator, which integrates the saturated field into a unified interior perspective. Three innate emotions (anger, fear, joy) operate as primary valenced differentiations from which the full emotional spectrum unfolds through combinatorial differentiation, analogous to primary colours generating the visible spectrum. Developmental sequencing (Stern, Rochat), deafblindness evidence (Keller), and cross-species mirror self-recognition support the four-stage account. Damasio's three-self model is engaged and refined at five points of divergence. A two-domain model distinguishes classical biological differentiation from the experiential domain, with Quantum Differentiation Resonance proposed as the mechanism sustaining the latter. Qualia are reframed as the interior aspect of differentiation once it has become emotionally weighted and recursively integrated. On this account, the hard problem of consciousness appears framework-bound rather than fundamental: physical and experiential are not two separate things requiring a bridge between them, but one differentiating process described in two languages.
Paul W. Barnes (Sun,) studied this question.