Analysis reports improved outcomes in late experience operators for complex aneurysm repair, suggesting training plays a key role.
Objectives: The study objectives are to evaluate the impact of the operator’s learning curve on the outcomes of off-the-shelf branched endovascular aortic repair (OTS-BEVAR) in complex and thoracoabdominal (C/TAAAs) aneurysms. Methods: Patients who underwent OTS-BEVAR (T-Branch, Cook-Medical) between 2013 and 2023 were considered. The first and last 25 cases with at least 1 year of follow-up were clustered in two groups (early experience: E.Exp.; late experience: L.Exp.) and compared. Technical success (TS), intraoperative target visceral vessel (TVV) loss, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), 30-day mortality, and TVV instability at 1 year were assessed as primary outcomes. Procedure/fluoroscopy time, iodinated contrast media (ICM) amount and length of hospitalization were assessed as secondary outcomes. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, 106 cases were analyzed. Technical success was higher in L.Exp. than E.Exp. (L.Exp.: 25/25 vs. E.Exp.: 17/25; p: 0.004). Moreover, intraoperative TVVs loss was higher in E.Exp. than L.Exp. (E.Exp.: 12/25 vs. L.Exp.: 0/25; p: 0.0001). There were no differences in terms of 30-day/in-hospital mortality (E.Exp.:4/25 vs. L.Exp.:4/25; p: 1), SCI (E.Exp.:2/25 vs. L.Exp.:1/25; p: 1), and paraplegia (E.Exp.: 2/25 vs. L.Exp.: 0/25; p: 0.48) between E.Exp. and L.Exp. Cases of L.Exp. had lower fluoroscopy [E.Exp.: 160(21) vs. L.Exp.:72(18) min; p: 0.003] and overall procedure time [E.Exp.: 518(156) vs. L.Exp.:400(130) min; p: 0.04], ICM [EE: 220(45) vs. L.Exp.: 138(61) mL; p: 0.005] and hospitalization [E.Exp.: 17(9) vs. L.Exp.: 12(4) days; p: 0.03] than cases of E.Exp. Finally, patients managed in L.Exp. had lower TVVs instability at 12 months than patients managed in the E.Exp. (E.Exp.: 8/25 vs. L.Exp.: 1/25; p: 0.04). Conclusions: Cases managed in L.Exp. have higher TS, lower intraoperative TVVs loss and instability at 1-year than cases of E.Exp. Moreover, procedural/fluoroscopy time, ICM, radiation exposure and hospitalization are lower in L.Exp. than E.Exp.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallitto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: