Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Findings show that cobalt-organic frameworks outperform zinc-analogues in lithium-ion batteries, implying better storage capabilities.
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as structurally designable materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their tunable coordination architecture and functionality. Herein, we report a couple of isostructural MOFs of divalent cobalt (1) and zinc (2), [MII2(bdc)2(DABCO)]n, [bdcH2 = terephthalic acid, DABCO = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane], and evaluate their lithium storage performance. Electrochemical properties and performance show that Co-MOF 1 has higher efficiency than the Zn congener, with an excellent specific capacity of 750 mAh g–1 after 10 cycles and last at 322 mAh g–1 after 200 cycles, which is a high electrochemical performance in specific capacity and rate cycle performance over the previous MOF-based materials. The ligand substitution at the metal centers of the MOFs triggered the single-crystal to single-crystal transformation toward corresponding [MII(H2O)(bdc)(DABCO)]n (1a and 2a) MOFs, which were investigated. First-principles computations revealed that the identity of the metal center critically governs the lithiation behavior of these MOFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tungad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: