Comparative analysis of synthesis methods shows coprecipitation enhances catalytic activity and surface area for CO2 methanation.
This study explores how synthesis methods affect the structure and CO 2 methanation performance of Ni–CeO 2 catalysts prepared by coprecipitation and impregnation under identical conditions. Coprecipitation generated particles below 100 nm with uniform elemental distribution, together with large bulk-like particles exhibiting locally concentrated Ni species, attributed to differences in hydroxide solubility. Impregnation, by contrast, produced very large particles (> 500 nm) with smaller particles attached, while maintaining relatively homogeneous elemental distribution. Coprecipitated catalysts showed slightly higher surface area and oxygen vacancy concentration, resulting in higher apparent turnover frequencies (TOF app ) below 300 °C due to enhanced CO 2 adsorption and high Ni site density. However, at temperatures above 350 °C, impregnated catalysts displayed higher CH 4 selectivity and TOF app , indicating reduced kinetic limitations and more efficient active-site utilization. These results provide insights for rational design of efficient CO 2 methanation catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuda et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: