Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study finds EUS point shear-wave elastography accurately assesses liver fibrosis, suggesting its integration into routine evaluations.
Background: EUS point shear‑wave elastography (EUS‑pSWE) permits near‑field, intraluminal assessment of liver stiffness. Objective: We examined its concordance with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and its diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3) in an expanded mixed cohort. Methods: One hundred twenty adults (57% men; mean age: 61 ± 10 years; body mass index: 28.9 ± 4.0) undergoing routine endoscopic ultrasound were prospectively enrolled. VCTE stratified fibrosis as F0–1 (<7.0 kPa, n = 96), F2 (7–9.4 kPa, n = 11) and F3‑4 (≥9.5 kPa, n = 13). In all the patients, 10 EUS‑pSWE measurements were performed in each lobe, and the liver stiffness result was the median value of the 10 measurements. Correlation (Pearson’s r ), Bland–Altman agreement, and diagnostic indices for F ≥3 were calculated. Results: Median EUS‑pSWE increased with fibrosis (left lobe: 5.0 ± 0.9, 7.8 ± 1.0, 15.1 ± 3.4 kPa for F0–1, F2, F3–4; P < 0.001). EUS-pSWE correlated strongly with VCTE ( r = 0.89, left; r = 0.88, right; P < 0.0001). AUROC for detecting F ≥3 reached 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.85–0.96) for the left and 0.89 (0.83–0.95) for the right lobe. A 10.2 kPa cutoff value for F3 afforded 85% sensitivity, 84% specificity, positive predictive value 72%, and negative predictive value 93%. EUS-pSWE provided lobe-independent stiffness estimates that tracked VCTE closely to recognize advanced fibrosis. Conclusions: Its high diagnostic accuracy across fibrosis stages and ability to integrate seamlessly into routine EUS make EUS-pSWE a valuable tool for comprehensive liver assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miutescu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: