The article reveals the duty of care responsibilities of workplaces to support domestic violence victims while working-from-home, highlighting complicity to ensure health and safety.
Domestic violence (DV) is a global problem affecting individuals, communities and societies, and increasingly a workplace problem. During the COVID-19 pandemic, home became both the workplace under government-directed lockdowns and a site for increased DV in a ‘shadow pandemic’ of violence. This article examines how workplaces supported DV victim–survivors when working-from-home during lockdowns. Drawing primary data from interviews with DV first-responders in Aotearoa New Zealand workplaces, a country with epidemic levels of DV, we theorise how workplaces conceptualised their responsibility for DV across ‘blurred’ spaces of home and work and enacted duty of care obligations when working-from-home. We argue that given DV is a complex work health and safety risk, mere legal compliance for protecting victims when working-from-home falls short of employers’ ethical responsibilities for ensuring safe workplaces and preventing violence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gavin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: