Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis identifies formaldehyde and heat stress effects on life expectancy, suggesting air pollutants outweigh socioeconomic factors.
Life expectancy in the United States varies significantly by region, a gap often explained by socioeconomic factors like income and education. However, the relative contribution of atmospheric exposures is less understood. We identify formaldehyde exposure and wet-bulb temperature as leading predictors of county-level life expectancy. Our analysis of 22,540 county-year observations (2012–2019) shows that formaldehyde ranked as the second-strongest predictor, surpassed only by educational attainment. Wet-bulb temperature, a physiological measure of heat stress, ranked sixth and was the leading meteorological predictor. We identified these patterns using XGBoost with SHAP analysis, integrating atmospheric exposures, livestock density, socioeconomic conditions, and smoking prevalence within an external exposome framework. These results suggest that air pollutants and heat stress provide predictive information beyond traditional socioeconomic indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shrestha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: