Key result
Once-daily rivaroxaban matches enoxaparin efficacy for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement.
Why the study?
Rivaroxaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor, could be an alternative to heparins and warfarin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement.
Does rivaroxaban prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement compared to enoxaparin?
RCT (n=873)
double-blind, double-dummy
randomized
Yes
Does rivaroxaban prevent venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement compared to enoxaparin?
p-value: p=0.0852
Rivaroxaban demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis after total hip replacement, supporting the 10 mg daily dose for further phase III investigation.
Rivaroxaban lowers VTE events versus enoxaparin after hip replacement; supports advancing the 10 mg dose to phase 3 trials.
BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939)--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--could be an alternative to heparins and warfarin for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. METHODS AND RESULTS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator-controlled, multinational, dose-ranging study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily rivaroxaban relative to enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. Patients (n=873) were randomized to once-daily oral rivaroxaban doses of 5, 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg (initiated 6 to 8 hours after surgery) or a once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin dose of 40 mg (given the evening before and > or = 6 hours after surgery). Study drugs were continued for an additional 5 to 9 days; mandatory bilateral venography was performed the following day. The primary end point (composite of any deep vein thrombosis, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality) was observed in 14.9%, 10.6%, 8.5%, 13.5%, 6.4%, and 25.2% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=618, per-protocol population). No significant dose-response relationship was found for efficacy (P=0.0852). Major postoperative bleeding was observed in 2.3%, 0.7%, 4.3%, 4.9%, 5.1%, and 1.9% of patients receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg rivaroxaban, and 40 mg enoxaparin, respectively (n=845, safety population), representing a significant dose-response relationship (P=0.0391). CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban showed efficacy and safety similar to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, with the convenience of once-daily oral dosing and without the need for coagulation monitoring. When both efficacy and safety are considered, these results suggest that 10 mg rivaroxaban once daily should be investigated in phase III studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eriksson et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in elective total hip replacement (n=873). Rivaroxaban vs. Enoxaparin 40 mg once-daily was evaluated on composite of any deep vein thrombosis, objectively confirmed pulmonary embolism, and all-cause mortality (p=0.0852). Once-daily oral rivaroxaban showed similar efficacy to enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total hip replacement, with primary endpoint rates of 6.4%-14.9% across doses vs 25.2%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: