Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores the relationship between n-bonacci protocols and quantum coherence in time quasicrystals, suggesting new theoretical insights.
This paper identifies a precise connection between the n-bonacci spectral mode hierarchy of the MNZI programme (Paper P [5]) and the physics of quasiperiodically driven quantum systems, also known as time quasicrystals. The n-bonacci criticality equation Σ(k = 1 to n) x^k = 1 (Lean-verified as MNZI.reciprocal_identity) characterises the unique stable threshold of the n-step memory branching process. Its solution r*n = 1 / Cn, where Cn is the n-bonacci constant, satisfies r*n > ½ for all finite n, and r*n → ½ monotonically at rate O(2^(−n)) (Lean-verified as MNZI.rn_decreasing and MNZI.rn_gt_half). The paper proposes the Criticality–Coherence Correspondence (Conjecture 3.1): for an n-bonacci quasiperiodic driving protocol, the quantum coherence enhancement over periodic driving is governed by r*n, the criticality threshold of the n-step memory system. Specifically: (i) The Fibonacci case (n = 2) The Fibonacci protocol achieves the largest deviation from the binary limit: r*2 = φ^(−1) ≈ 0.618, consistent with the reported approximately 3.7× coherence enhancement observed in 10-qubit time quasicrystal experiments. (ii) Higher-order protocols Higher-order protocols (n = 3, 4, ...) produce progressively smaller deviations: r*n → 1/2, corresponding to diminishing marginal coherence enhancement. (iii) The adelic limit The adelic limit r*∞ = ½ (maximum entropy, pure binary driving) represents the theoretical maximum coherence achievable by quasiperiodic means alone. This limit is approached, but never reached, for any finite n. The Buchanan Coil Invariant π²/12 > ln(2) (Lean-verified as MNZI.coil_exceeds_landauer) connects the spectral stiffness of the Riemann zero distribution to the Landauer erasure bound, suggesting a universal information-theoretic lower bound for coherence enhancement. Three testable predictions are formally registered. All mathematical results from the MNZI programme are machine-verified in Lean 4. All physical interpretations and conjectures are explicitly labelled as conjectural.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Buchanan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: