PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 13, 2026Perspectives on Psychological Science3 citations

Growing Technological Opacity and the Social Brain

View Full Paper
FOFrançois OsiurakGFGiovanni Federico

Key Points

  • The framework aims to explore the interplay between the technical and social brain in navigating complex technologies.
  • Developed a neurocognitive framework to describe the role of the social brain in technology engagement.
  • Examined processes of making and expert reliance within the context of technological opacity.
  • Analyzed how expertise influences cognitive resource allocation and network engagement.
  • Identified dynamic switching between technical and social brain networks in response to technological challenges.
  • Showed that bottom-up perceptual cues and causal uncertainty facilitate engagement with technology.
  • Highlighted the adaptive strategies humans employ when interacting with opaque technologies.

Abstract

Thanks to our remarkable ability to transmit technical content, our technologies have become more sophisticated. Intuitively, one might assume that this evolution has imposed greater demands on the technical brain. However, recent neuroscientific research suggests that this evolution has also increasingly engaged the social brain to address the opacity it has generated in making, transactive, and use processes. Here, we build on these findings to design a neurocognitive framework that outlines the role of the social brain in (a) facilitating the transmission of making processes, (b) relying on human experts as extensions of our technical cognition, and (c) engaging with certain technologies—including machines—as if they were intentional biological agents. The framework emphasizes the dynamic interplay between the technical and social brain and explores the mechanisms that drive switching between these networks in response to technological opacity, including bottom-up perceptual cues and causal uncertainty. It also considers how expertise modulates network engagement and guides the allocation of cognitive resources. Overall, this framework provides a unified perspective on how humans navigate complex technological environments, illustrating the coevolution of technical and social cognition and the adaptive strategies that allow us to interact with technologies that we cannot fully understand.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Osiurak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04151779e20c90b4444e67https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261438090
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transactive memory in close relationships.1991 · 598 citations
  2. 2Increases in Depressive Symptoms, Suicide-Related Outcomes, and Suicide Rates Among U.S. Adolescents After 2010 and Links to Increased New Media Screen Time2017 · 1,713 citations
  3. 3Do social media experiments prove a link with mental health: A methodological and meta-analytic review.2024 · 52 citations
  4. 4The technical-reasoning network is recruited when people observe others make or teach how to make tools: An fMRI study2025 · 9 citations
  5. 5Two distinct neural pathways for mechanical versus digital technology2024 · 12 citations