Examines due date assignment in a dynamic machine environment, highlighting trade-offs between performance and delivery compliance.
In this study, due date assignment problem is addressed in a dynamic and stochastic single machine environment with family setups. A due date is to be assigned for each new job immediately at the time of its arrival. While assigning a due date for the new arrival, non-complete jobs that have arrived before that job and whose due dates are already assigned, are also considered and rescheduled. While assigning a short due date for the new arrival as close as possible, compliance to assigned due dates of non-complete jobs is necessary. These two objectives conflict with each other. The trade-off between assigning tight and loose due dates reflects the trade-off between competitive power and delivery performance. To solve this problem, a two-phase solution methodology is proposed where a sequential lexicographic approach is followed. In the first phase, a capacity allocation takes place for families before observing any actual jobs arrivals, based on expected workload and arrival estimation, in a periodic and static manner. In this phase, families can be assigned to batches, and a batching structure is formed. In the second phase, a due date is assigned for the new arrival immediately in an online fashion, based on the outputs of the first phase. A mixed integer programming model is developed for each phase. Also, a heuristic algorithm is proposed for the second phase. Simultaneously, a discrete event simulation is carried out to imitate a real production system. The performance of the designed policy is measured through the developed simulation model and results are reported under different control and system parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Düzgit et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: