Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved geometric error control in digital twin BIM models, suggesting enhanced usability for engineering applications.
Lightweighting Building Information Modeling (BIM) models for digital-twin applications requires balancing aggressive geometric reduction with component-level engineering tolerances and mesh usability. Most geometric simplification pipelines apply uniform ratios or hand-tuned heuristics, which struggle to accommodate the strong heterogeneity of BIM components in functional role, geometric complexity, and detail distribution. End-to-end learning-based simplification can be adaptive, but it often entangles decision-making with geometric editing, making engineering constraints difficult to enforce and audit. We present Semantic-Geometric Co-driven Adaptive Budget Estimation and Reduction for BIM (SABER-BIM), which formulates lightweighting as a component-level face-budget allocation problem. Conditioned on Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) types and structure-sensitive geometric descriptors, SABER-BIM predicts target face counts for individual components and then meets a user-specified global budget through global scaling. The predicted budgets are executed by a robust geometric backend (e.g., quadric error metrics, QEM), yielding an auditable and easily deployable pipeline. To address the absence of direct supervision, we introduce an offline pseudo-ground-truth procedure that searches for the minimum feasible target face count for each component under semantic-aware tolerance and mesh-validity constraints. Experiments on the IFCNet dataset show that SABER-BIM allocates budgets more effectively under identical global constraints, improving stability in both geometric error control and engineering usability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: