Review analyzes UAV scheduling strategies for disaster scenarios, highlighting the need for risk-aware frameworks.
Low-altitude UAV scheduling and planning has become a critical technological pillar in disaster response systems; however, systemic challenges in complex environments and under uncertain risk conditions remain insufficiently understood. Although substantial progress has been achieved in model formulation and algorithm design in recent years, scheduling and planning frameworks still lack a systematic representation of key risk factors, such as meteorological disturbances, terrain damage, and communication constraints, thereby undermining operational safety and decision reliability. This study conducts a systematic review of low-altitude UAV scheduling and planning research over the past decade, covering representative disaster scenarios including forest fires, large building fires, earthquakes, floods, major public health emergencies, and traffic accidents. By comparatively analyzing scheduling objectives and technical pathways across the pre-disaster, during-disaster, and post-disaster stages, this paper summarizes the dominant research paradigms and limitations of multi-UAV coordination, air–ground coordination, and risk reduction-oriented scheduling and planning. This review reveals that existing approaches generally lack explicit modeling of dynamic risks and uncertainties, highlighting an urgent need to incorporate risk-aware considerations and reliability analysis frameworks into scheduling and planning to enhance the overall robustness and decision credibility of UAV systems in disaster environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: