Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Learned indexes have been proposed to replace classic index structures like B-Tree with machine learning (ML) models. They require to replace both the indexes and query processing algorithms currently deployed by the databases, and such a radical departure is likely to encounter challenges and obstacles. In contrast, we propose a fundamentally different way of using ML techniques to build a better R-Tree without the need to change the structure or query processing algorithms of traditional R-Tree. Specifically, we develop reinforcement learning (RL) based models to decide how to choose a subtree for insertion and how to split a node when building and updating an R-Tree, instead of relying on hand-crafted heuristic rules currently used by the R-Tree and its variants. Experiments on real and synthetic datasets with up to more than 100 million spatial objects show that our RL based index outperforms the R-Tree and its variants in terms of query processing time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: