Key result
Impaired 6-month flow-mediated dilation is linked to a ~7-fold increase in late in-stent restenosis.
Why the study?
Simple and noninvasive identification of late in-stent restenosis after PCI might help select patients for further angiographic evaluation.
Is impaired flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery associated with late in-stent restenosis after PCI?
Cohort (n=141)
Is impaired flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery associated with late in-stent restenosis after PCI?
Odds Ratio: 7.4 (95% CI 2.8–19.2)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Noninvasive assessment of brachial artery endothelial function at 6 months post-PCI is strongly associated with late in-stent restenosis and may help identify patients needing angiographic evaluation.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether endothelial dysfunction in the brachial artery might be associated with late in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Simple and noninvasive identification of late ISR might help to select patients who require further angiographic evaluation. METHODS: Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was measured before (initial FMD) and at six months (follow-up FMD) after PCI in 141 consecutive patients who had elective and successful PCI with bare metal stents in de novo lesions of native coronary arteries for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Follow-up angiography was performed at six months after PCI in all patients. RESULTS: With multivariate logistic regression analysis, the impairment (< or = 4.8% dilation from baseline diameter) of FMD at follow-up showed the strongest association with late ISR (defined as > 50% diameter stenosis, n = 46) independently of other clinical and angiographic variables known to be associated with ISR (odds ratio 7.4, 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 19.2, p < 0.001), whereas the initial FMD did not have the association. The sensitivity of impaired FMD at follow-up (69%) in detecting ISR was higher than chest pain during the follow-up period (45%), with comparable specificity. The impaired FMD in combination with the chest pain increased the sensitivity to 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The impairment of FMD in the brachial artery at the time of follow-up was independently and closely associated with late ISR in native coronary arteries. The noninvasive assessment of FMD at the time of follow-up might be useful for identification of late ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitta et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic coronary artery disease (n=141). Impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at follow-up (≤ 4.8% dilation) vs. Unimpaired FMD was evaluated on Late in-stent restenosis (ISR) defined as > 50% diameter stenosis (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.8 to 19.2, p=< 0.001). Impairment of flow-mediated dilation at 6-month follow-up was strongly associated with late in-stent restenosis (OR 7.4; 95% CI 2.8 to 19.2; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: