experiments were performed to investigate the biomechanical, cytologic, and osteogenic performance of the scaffolds, while computational fluid dynamics simulations were used to explore the underlying mechanisms. Diamond scaffolds have a better loading capacity, and the mechanical behaviors and fluid flow of Voronoi scaffolds are similar to those of the human trabecular bone. Cells showed more proliferation and distribution on the Diamond and Voronoi scaffolds and exhibited evident differentiation on Gyroid and Voronoi scaffolds. Bone formation was apparent on the inner part of the Gyroid, the outer part of the I-WP, and the entire Diamond and Voronoi scaffolds. The hydrodynamic properties and stimulus response of cells influenced by the porous structure account for the varied biological performance of the scaffolds. The Voronoi scaffolds with bionic mechanical behavior and an appropriate hydrodynamic response exhibit evident cell growth and osteogenesis, making them preferable for porous structural bone implants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: