PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2000Journal of Economic Entomology51 citationsOpen Access

An In-Field Screen for Early Detection and Monitoring of Insect Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in Transgenic Crops

View Full Paper
RVRobert C. VenetteWHW. D. HutchisonDADavid A. Andow

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We present a field-based approach to detect and monitor insects with resistance to insecticidal toxins produced by transgenic plants. Our objective is to estimate the phenotypic frequency of resistance in a population by relating the densities of insects on genetically transformed plants to densities on nontransformed plants. We focus on European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), in sweet corn, Zea mays L., expressing Cry1Ab from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Berliner to illustrate principles underlying the method. The probability of detecting one or more rare, resistant larvae depends on sample size, the density of larvae on nontransformed plants, and an assumed frequency of resistant phenotypes in a given population. Probability of detection increases with increases in sample size, background density, or the frequency of resistant individuals. Following binomial probability theory, if a frequency of 10(-4) is expected, 10(3)-10(4) samples must be collected from a B. thuringiensis (Bt) crop to have at least a 95% probability of locating one or more resistant larvae. In-field screens using transgenic crops have several advantages over traditional laboratory-based methods, including exposure to a large number of feral insects, discrimination of resistant individuals based on Bt dosages expressed in the field, incorporation of natural and Bt-induced mortality factors, simultaneous monitoring for more than one insect species, and ease of use. The approach is amenable to field survey crews working in research, extension, and within the seed corn industry. Estimates of the phenotypic frequency of resistance from the in-field screen can be useful for estimating initial frequency of resistant alleles. Bayesian statistical methods are outlined to estimate phenotype frequencies, allele frequencies, and associated confidence intervals from field data. Results of the approach are discussed relative to existing complementary methods currently available for O. nubilalis and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Venette et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a04b820a39ef611adad3988https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.4.1055
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Insecticide/acaricide resistance: Industry's efforts and plans to cope1988 · 17 citations
  2. 2Oviposition of European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Impact of Natural Enemy Populations in Transgenic Versus Isogenic Corn1997 · 168 citations
  3. 3Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis CrylAb Toxin to the Predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)1998 · 256 citations
  4. 4Monitoring for European corn borer (lepidoptera: crambidae) resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis: logistical considerations when sampling larvae1998 · 21 citations
  5. 5Survivorship of Field-Collected European Corn Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Larvae and Its Impact on Estimates of Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner2000 · 4 citations