Key result
Routine application of bleeding risk scoring systems, such as CRUSADE, is recommended to guide the choice and dosing of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Does evaluating hemorrhagic risk improve the balance between effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does evaluating hemorrhagic risk improve the balance between effectiveness and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Routine evaluation of hemorrhagic risk using established scoring systems is crucial for balancing the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Supports bleeding risk scores like CRUSADE for antithrombotic guidance in ACS; leaves open need for randomized validation.
Due to prevention and minimization of ischemic complications, antithrombotic therapy with acute coronary syndrome is efficient and justified. However, bleeding as possible adverse effect leaves an open question: where is the boundary between it's benefit and safety. The bleeding is associated with up to seven times higher mortality during the first month from initiation of the antithrombotic therapy. The level of hemorrhagic risk depends on numerous factors: sex, age, comorbidities, clinical manifestations of acute coronary syndrome, clearance of creatinine, as well as on the therapeutic approach and location of bleeding. The aim of this paper was to point out the significance of evaluation of hemorrhagic risk when initiating and dosing the antithrombotic medication, in order to establish balance between effectiveness and safety and improve prognosis of the disease. Up to now, several scoring systems have been developed to evaluate the risk of bleeding, and their application is recommended on daily basis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Č Ostojić Miodrag (2013) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndrome. Antithrombotic therapy was evaluated. Routine application of bleeding risk scoring systems, such as CRUSADE, is recommended to guide the choice and dosing of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: