Key result
Early LV reverse remodeling after AF ablation linked to ~43% lower risk of composite events.
Why the study?
Left ventricular reverse remodeling following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation had not been fully elucidated, particularly regarding its prognostic impact in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Does early left ventricular reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation improve prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=302)
Does early left ventricular reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation improve prognosis in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Early left ventricular reverse remodeling after atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with systolic dysfunction is associated with significantly lower rates of AF recurrence, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality.
May aid post-AF ablation risk stratification in LV systolic dysfunction; leaves open whether remodeling confers causal benefit.
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR) following catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) has not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the clinical impact of early LVRR after AFCA on prognosis in patients with LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: Of 1,989 consecutive patients undergoing first-time AFCA, 302 patients with a baseline LV ejection fraction < 50% were included. LVRR was defined as a decrease in the LV end-systolic volume of ≥ 15% on an echocardiography at 3 months after AFCA. The clinical outcomes and prognoses were compared between patients with and without LVRR. RESULTS: LVRR was observed in 191 (63%) patients at 3 months after AFCA. A multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that non-paroxysmal AF, non-cardiomyopathy, absence of early recurrence, QRS duration ≤ 120 ms were significantly associated with the LVRR after 3 months. During a median follow-up period of 30 (16-50) months, patients with LVRR showed a lower incidence of AF recurrence (24.1% vs. 39.6%; p = 0.004), heart failure hospitalizations (5.8% vs. 13.5%; p = 0.022), all-cause mortality (4.2% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.017), and composite events including recurrence, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality (26.7% vs. 48.7%; p < 0.001) compared to those without. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the LVRR at 3 months was independently associated with AF recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.624, p = 0.029) and composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 0.573, p = 0.006) after AFCA. CONCLUSIONS: The LVRR emerged in two-third of the patients with LVSD after 3 months of AFCA. Early LVRR was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and prognoses after AFCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazawa et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=302). Early left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) vs. Without LVRR was evaluated on Composite events including recurrence, heart failure hospitalization, and mortality (HR 0.573, p=0.006). Early left ventricular reverse remodeling after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation was associated with a lower risk of composite events (HR 0.573, p=0.006) compared to no reverse remodeling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: