Key result
Dabigatran linked to ~373% greater odds of switching NOACs within 12 months versus apixaban.
Why the study?
The study aimed to provide real-world data from a whole large European country regarding the use of NOACs in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
What are the baseline characteristics and prescription patterns of NOACs in a nationwide Italian cohort of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=683,172)
Yes
What are the baseline characteristics and prescription patterns of NOACs in a nationwide Italian cohort of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: OR 4.73 (95% CI 4.07-5.51)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.8% vs 1.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
This large nationwide Italian registry study demonstrates that NOAC prescriptions for NVAF align with guidelines, with rivaroxaban being the most prescribed and a significant proportion of patients switching from VKAs due to labile INR.
May warrant closer persistence monitoring with dabigatran versus apixaban in NVAF; extends real-world switching data but leaves drivers unresolved.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with an increased risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Anticoagulation with Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or with novel oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) represents the cornerstone of the pharmacological treatment to reduce the risk of thromboembolism. This study aims to provide real-world data from a whole large European country about NOAC use in "non-valvular atrial fibrillation" (NVAF). METHODS: We analysed the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) monitoring registries collecting data of a nationwide cohort of patients with "NVAF" treated with NOACs. Using logistic regression analysis, baseline characteristics and treatment discontinuation information were compared among initiators of the 4 NOACs. RESULTS: In the reference period, the NOAC database collected data for 683,172 patients. The median age was 78 years with 19.5% aged 85 or older. Overall, the treatments were in accordance with guidelines. About 1/3 of patients switched from a prior VKA treatment; in the 72.3% of cases, these patients had a labile International Normalized Ratio (INR) at first prescription. The most prescribed NOAC was rivaroxaban, followed by apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest European real-world study ever published on NOACs. It includes all Italian patients treated with NOACs since 2013 accounting for about 1/3 of subjects with AF. The enrolled population consisted of very elderly patients, at high risk of ischemic adverse events. The AIFA registries are consolidated tools that guarantee the appropriateness of prescription and provide important information for the governance of National Health System by collecting real-world data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olimpieri et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=683,172). Dabigatran vs. Apixaban was evaluated on Switching to another NOAC within 12 months (OR 4.73, 95% CI 4.07-5.51, p=<0.001). In a nationwide Italian cohort of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, dabigatran was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of switching to another NOAC within 12 months compared to apixaban (OR 4.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: