Key result
Antiplatelets linked to ~6.4-fold greater upper extremity DVT risk vs anticoagulants after pacemaker implantation.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis after pacemaker implantation.
Do antiplatelet agents increase the risk of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis compared to anticoagulants in patients after pacemaker implantation?
Observational (n=148)
No
Do antiplatelet agents increase the risk of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis compared to anticoagulants in patients after pacemaker implantation?
Effect estimate: OR 6.4
p-value: p=0.033
Patients receiving antiplatelet agents have a significantly higher risk of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis after pacemaker implantation compared to those on anticoagulants.
Antiplatelet use may warrant caution after pacemaker implantation; this Level 3 association leaves open whether anticoagulants are preferable in randomized trials.
Objective. To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and treatment outcomes of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis after pacemaker implantation. Material and methods. A prospective single-center study included patients with indications for pacemaker implantation. The follow-up period was 12 months. Physical examination, ultrasound of upper and lower extremity veins and monitoring of pacemaker function were carried out before implantation, 1 and 12 months later. Additional ultrasound was necessary for treatment control in case of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. Results. There were 148 patients. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 10 (6.8%) cases throughout the follow-up period: 8 (5.4%) cases of subclavian vein thrombosis and 2 (1.4%) cases of superficial thrombophlebitis of lower extremities. According to multivariate analysis, the odds ratio of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis was 6.4 times (p=0.033) higher in patients receiving antiplatelet agents (acetylsalicylic acid) compared to anticoagulants. Treatment of venous thrombosis implied rivaroxaban. In 5 out of 6 patients, vein recanalization was achieved within 3 months, in 1 case — within 12 months. One patient had subconjunctival hemorrhage that required short-term discontinuation of anticoagulation without effect on baseline result. Conclusion. Annual incidence of venous thromboembolism after pacemaker implantation was 6.8%. Risk factor of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis was the type of antithrombotic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Povarov et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Pacemaker implantation (n=148). Antiplatelet agents (acetylsalicylic acid) vs. Anticoagulants was evaluated on Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (OR 6.4, p=0.033). Receiving antiplatelet agents was associated with a 6.4-fold higher odds of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis compared to anticoagulants after pacemaker implantation (OR 6.4; p=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: