Key result
Prehospital ST-segment resolution shows no difference in significant coronary lesions versus no resolution in STEMI.
Why the study?
Does ST-segment resolution between prehospital and in-hospital ECG predict the absence of significant coronary lesions in patients with prehospital STEMI?
Observational (n=83)
No
Does ST-segment resolution between prehospital and in-hospital ECG predict the absence of significant coronary lesions in patients with prehospital STEMI?
Patients with prehospital STEMI who experience ST-segment resolution upon hospital arrival still have high rates of significant coronary lesions, indicating that cardiac catheterization remains warranted.
STR does not exclude significant lesions in prehospital STEMI; leaves open whether catheterization can be safely deferred.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and significance of ST-segment elevation resolution between prehospital and first hospital ECG. METHODS: We examined consecutive prehospital ECGs transmitted to a single medical command center in southwestern Pennsylvania between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011. We included ECG cases with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and excluded cases with incomplete prehospital and/or hospital data. Our primary outcome was ST-segment resolution (STR), defined by cases no longer meeting STEMI criteria on the first in-hospital ECG. Primary variables of interest included prehospital vital signs and treatment, cardiac catheterization findings, and time intervals for diagnostics and treatment. Analysis included t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared analysis for categorical variables. RESULTS: We reviewed 24,197 prehospital ECGs and identified 293 cases of prehospital STEMI. Complete hospital and prehospital records were available for 83 cases (28%). Analyzed cohort was an average 62 years old and the majority were male (67%), with a primary complaint of chest pain (93%). STR occurred in 18 cases (22%, CI 14-32%). There were no differences between STR and non-STR cases in prehospital vital signs or treatments. 95% of patients underwent cardiac catheterization with a mean door-to-needle time of 57 minutes (interquartile range 43-71). Comparing STR and non-STR cases, significant lesions (≥50%) were found in 94 and 97% of patients (p = 0.6), and subtotal or total lesions (≥95%) were found in 63 and 85% (p = 0.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found that ST-segment resolution occurred prior to catheterization in 1 of 5 patients with prehospital STEMI, emphasizing the necessity of prehospital ECG in risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary disease. Coronary lesions and intervention rates did not differ between STR and non-STR, suggesting that catheterization is warranted even when STEMI criteria are no longer met in-hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ownbey et al. (2014) conducted an observational in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=83). ST-segment resolution (STR) vs. Non-STR was evaluated on ST-segment resolution (STR) on first in-hospital ECG (95% CI 14-32). ST-segment resolution occurred prior to catheterization in 22% of prehospital STEMI patients, but significant coronary lesions did not differ between STR (94%) and non-STR (97%) cases (p=0.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: