Key result
Significant inter-operator variation exists in the efficacy of primary PCI for STEMI, with optimal myocardial reperfusion rates ranging from 29.2% to 55.5% among six experienced cardiologists.
Why the study?
Does the individual operator affect the rate of optimal myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
Observational (n=1,071)
No
Does the individual operator affect the rate of optimal myocardial reperfusion in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI?
There is significant inter-operator variation in achieving optimal myocardial reperfusion during primary PCI for STEMI, highlighting the need for routine evaluation of individual operator competence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inter-operator variation in STEMI PCI reperfusion warrants performance monitoring; leaves open whether targeted training improves outcomes.
AIMS: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a widely practised therapeutic procedure to treat ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, a significant proportion of patients undergoing primary PCI suffers from adverse events, such as incomplete myocardial reperfusion. It is currently unknown to which degree these adverse events are operator related. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated inter-operator variation using objective safety and efficacy endpoints during primary PCI for STEMI. All PCIs were performed by six experienced interventional cardiologists as part of a randomised single centre trial. The primary endpoint of this study was optimal myocardial reperfusion (myocardial blush grade 3 [MBG]). All 1,071 patients enrolled in the Thrombus Aspiration during Percutaneous coronary intervention in Acute myocardial infarction Study (TAPAS) were included in this analysis. In the six operator groups, the rate of the primary endpoint MBG 3 ranged between 29.2% and 55.5%. The variable for operators remained significantly associated with MBG 3 after adjustment for baseline and procedural differences. There were no statistical differences observed with regard to safety endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates the observation that even in a controlled setting significant inter-operator variation may exist in the efficacy of primary PCI. This study supports the routine collection of high-quality datasets to evaluate and improve individual operator competence and skills.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vlaar et al. (2011) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=1,071). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Inter-operator variation (six operators) was evaluated on Optimal myocardial reperfusion (myocardial blush grade 3 [MBG]). Significant inter-operator variation exists in the efficacy of primary PCI for STEMI, with optimal myocardial reperfusion rates ranging from 29.2% to 55.5% among six experienced cardiologists.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: