Key result
Longer delays to surgical repair of post-infarction VSR linked to higher in-hospital mortality.
Why the study?
Post-MI VSR carries high mortality, and optimal surgical timing remains controversial because early surgery risks friable tissue while delay risks hemodynamic collapse.
Does the interval from symptom onset to surgical repair impact in-hospital mortality in patients with post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture?
Cohort (n=59)
No
Does the interval from symptom onset to surgical repair impact in-hospital mortality in patients with post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with post-infarction ventricular septal rupture, longer delays from symptom onset to surgical repair are associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality.
Background Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (post-MI VSR) is a rare yet catastrophic complication of transmural infarction. Despite a declining incidence with contemporary reperfusion strategies, mortality remains high, ranging from 40% to 80%, even after surgical repair. The interval between the ischaemic event and surgery is a key determinant of outcome. Early surgery risks friable tissue and patch dehiscence, whereas delay may precipitate haemodynamic collapse and multiorgan failure. The optimal surgical timing remains controversial. Purpose To evaluate the impact of the interval from myocardial infarction to surgical repair on in-hospital mortality in patients with post-MI VSR, and to assess whether the delay from symptom onset to hospital admission influenced survival. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 59 consecutive patients diagnosed with VSR secondary to acute myocardial infarction, admitted between 2000 and 2024 to a specialised cardiology centre in Brazil. Temporal variables were collected: time from symptom onset to hospital admission, time from symptom onset to surgery, and time from admission to surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (v4.2.2). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests, respectively. Variables with p ≤ 0.20 in univariate analysis were included in a stepwise logistic regression model, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05. Results The mean time from symptom onset to admission was 26.8 ± 47.4 days, to surgery 39.1 ± 57.7 days, and from admission to surgery 11.2 ± 30.6 days. Overall in-hospital mortality was 54.4%. Non-survivors experienced longer delays from symptom onset to surgery (52.4 vs 23.3 days; p = 0.015) and from admission to surgery (p = 0.006). Conclusions In patients with VSR following acute myocardial infarction, in-hospital mortality was exceptionally high and independently associated with a longer interval from symptom onset to surgical repair. A trend towards poorer outcomes was also observed with delayed hospital admission. These findings suggest that survival hinges not only on surgical timing but on the entire timeline from symptom onset to intervention, including early recognition and stabilisation. Minimising diagnostic and logistical delays could significantly improve outcomes in this critical condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (n=59). Surgical repair timing (interval from symptom onset to surgery) vs. Shorter vs longer delays was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=0.015). Longer delays from symptom onset to surgical repair of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (52.4 days in non-survivors vs 23.3 days; p=0.015).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: