Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative study examines access and influence of teacher leaders in policy making, suggesting limitations in their roles.
Teacher leadership is framed as participatory governance, yet teacher leaders (TLs) may remain implementers rather than authorized co-deciders. This qualitative study examines TLs’ participation in school-level policy making through three governance dimensions: access, influence, and boundary crossing. Findings from semi-structured interviews with 20 classroom TLs suggest that access is managed through selective invitation, service-based entry, and informal corridor decision circuits, shaping where TLs can exert influence. Consequently, influence concentrates in low-stakes pedagogical domains and is often diluted or reversed during formal approval as issues become more sensitive and consequential. Under such conditions, boundary regulation tightens, producing performative participation and self-silencing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghamrawi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: