Argues for a nuanced understanding of consistency in mathematics through contrasting practices.
Consistency appears to be an essential feature of mainstream mathematics: practices deemed inconsistent are either rejected as incorrect, or treated as outsiders. In this paper I analyze the role of consistency in mathematics by looking at deviations from consistency: I argue that attempts to ground the distinction between mainstream and inconsistent mathematics cannot succeed without incorporating some kind of practice-level commitment to inconsistency, and propose a notion of inconsistent practice which clarifies, by way of contrast, how consistency functions in the mainstream. This exemplifies a general methodology for better understanding core features of mainstream practices through contrast with deviating practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franci Mangraviti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: