Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review assesses cross-kingdom gene regulation by plant miRNAs in mammals, indicating ongoing debates and challenges.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. In plants, miRNAs are involved in environmental responses and can be transferred to other species to mediate cross-kingdom regulation of gene expression. This mechanism has recently been proposed in mammals, yet evidence remains scarce and inconsistent. Multiple studies have shown that a fraction of plant-derived miRNAs (pmiRNAs) present in food resist processing, cooking, and digestion. Evidence suggests that dietary-derived pmiRNAs might be absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract and enter circulation, predominantly packaged in extracellular vesicles, and reach different tissues, where they might exert cross-kingdom gene expression regulation. Nonetheless, several attempts to reproduce or confirm the above results have failed, raising questions about the reliability of studies supporting the hypothesis of cross-kingdom gene regulation by pmiRNAs. In this review, we recapitulate the state-of-the-art knowledge in the field, addressing both supporting and opposing evidence, as well as the main analytical challenges that need to be taken into consideration, in an effort to provide a comprehensive framework on the controversial evidence collected so far and support the use of best practices for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsagani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: