Examines rTMS effects on pain-related alpha activity in healthy adults, suggesting mechanisms for neuroplasticity.
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the posterior superior insula (PSI) can produce analgesia, although the underlying mechanisms require further exploration. While alpha oscillations have been implicated in rTMS-induced plasticity, research has largely focused on resting-state metrics, whereas alterations in perturbation-evoked alpha activity remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of PSI rTMS on perturbation-evoked alpha activity within a capsaicin-induced tonic pain model. METHODS: Twenty healthy adults (10 females) completed two randomised, counterbalanced rTMS sessions (active, sham). Capsaicin was applied to the forearm for 90 min and pain intensity recorded at 5 min intervals on a numerical rating scale. Left PSI rTMS (10 Hz, 100 pulses/train, 15 trains) was delivered ∼50 min after capsaicin application. Evoked electroencephalographic responses to primary motor cortex (M1) TMS were assessed at baseline, during capsaicin-induced pain pre-rTMS, and post-rTMS. The frontocentral event-related spectral perturbation (ERSP) and parietal-occipital inter-trial coherence (ITC) were extracted. RESULTS: Baseline-normalised frontocentral ERSP showed a more positive pre-to-post change in M1-TMS-evoked alpha power following active rTMS relative to sham (p = 0.013), though no significant effect on ITC was observed. Exploratory analysis showed that lower pre-rTMS ITC predicted a greater reduction in pain with active rTMS (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PSI-rTMS modulates evoked alpha oscillatory power in frontocentral regions, advancing our understanding of the mechanisms underlying rTMS-induced analgesia. Evoked frontocentral alpha power may index a change in pain state, whereas exploratory findings suggest that alpha-band parietal-occipital ITC may predict individual differences in the rTMS analgesic response, though larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chowdhury et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: