Key result
Elevated PTAR is independently associated with increased mortality in critically ill CAD patients; combining it with the SOFA score improved prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.727 vs 0.667, P < .001).
Why the study?
Does elevated PTAR predict mortality in critically ill adult patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort
Does elevated PTAR predict mortality in critically ill adult patients with coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated PTAR is an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill CAD patients, and its combination with the SOFA score improves prognostic accuracy.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of mortality in the intensive care units. The prothrombin time-international normalized ratio-to-albumin ratio (PTAR), integrating coagulation status and nutritional/inflammatory conditions, may provide additional prognostic information. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of PTAR in predicting the mortality risk in critically ill patients with CAD. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database to evaluate the relationship between PTAR and all-cause mortality. Adult CAD was categorized into quartiles according to PTAR levels. Cox proportional-hazards models were constructed to explore the independent association between PTAR and 28-day mortality, with progressive adjustment for potential confounders. Restricted cubic spline analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed to assess dose-response patterns, survival differences, and predictive performance. Subgroup and interaction analyses were also conducted across the major clinical strata. Elevated PTAR levels were independently associated with increased mortality. The 28-day and 365-day all-cause mortality rates were 18.7% and 22.6%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated a moderate discriminatory ability for PTAR (area under the curve = 0.667), which was significantly improved when combined with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (area under the curve = 0.727, P < .001). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a nonlinear dose-response relationship between PTAR and mortality (P < .001). Subgroup analyses showed consistent results across most clinical strata, except for race. Elevated PTAR is independently and significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality in critically ill CAD patients. Its combination with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score improves the prognostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease. Prothrombin time-international normalized ratio-to-albumin ratio (PTAR) vs. Lower PTAR levels was evaluated on 28-day mortality (p=< .001). Elevated PTAR is independently associated with increased mortality in critically ill CAD patients; combining it with the SOFA score improved prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.727 vs 0.667, P < .001).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: