Qualitative analysis identifies barriers faced by NCAA women coaches, highlighting their complex interplay.
Purpose This article aims to investigate the barriers that NCAA women coaches face in their careers. We employ the ecological systems theory (EST) to analyze barriers on four different levels: individual, interpersonal, organizational and societal. Design/methodology/approach We used semi-structured interviews with 18 NCAA women coaches. Using an interpretive lens, we offer nuanced descriptions of the barriers that women coaches face throughout their careers and how these barriers impact each other. Findings We identify three main categories of barriers, analyze them across levels, and propose the connections and directionality of impact between these barriers, thus uncovering the nuanced dynamics of their interplay. Originality/value We refine EST framework by demonstrating the connections across levels, as well as the flow of these connections, that can be uni- or bidirectional. We also identify a disproportionate impact of the organizational level on barriers at other levels, highlighting its significance in the research context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boiarintseva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: