PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions2 citations

Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in the United States: Early Results From the AGENT Postapproval Study

View Full Paper
CLChristina LalaniESEric SecemskyYSYang Song

Key Result

Real-world use of paclitaxel-coated balloons for in-stent restenosis grew to 17.5% of procedures, with unadjusted in-hospital adverse outcomes similar to drug-eluting stents (SMD <10%).

Key Points

  • To evaluate trends in drug-coated balloon (DCB) use and compare outcomes with alternative treatments for in-stent restenosis (ISR).
  • Included patients from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Disease Registry CathPCI Registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 2024 and June 2025.
  • Compared treatment outcomes of DCB, drug-eluting stent (DES), and plain old balloon angioplasty using standard mean differences.
  • Analyzed data from 14,946 DCB procedures performed in 12,337 patients across 704 registry sites.
  • DCB procedures increased from <1% to 17.5% monthly for ISR interventions during the study period.
  • Among 96,452 ISR procedures, 9269 (9.61%) involved DCB use, showing a preference for DCB over DES and balloon angioplasty.
  • In-hospital adverse outcomes were similar for DCB and DES, with a myocardial infarction rate of 0.4% among DCB users.

Study Design

Type

Observational

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does paclitaxel-coated balloon use result in similar in-hospital outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents or plain old balloon angioplasty in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?

P
Population
Patients in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Disease Registry CathPCI Registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 2024 and June 2025.
I
Intervention
Paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB)
C
Comparator
Drug-eluting stent (DES) or plain old balloon angioplasty
O
Outcome
In-hospital outcomes and trends in DCB usehard clinical

Real-world use of paclitaxel-coated balloons in the US is rapidly increasing for both ISR and non-ISR lesions, with early in-hospital adverse outcomes similar to drug-eluting stents.

Main Result

Effect estimate: Standard mean difference <10%

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AGENT is the only coronary drug-coated balloon (DCB) approved for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to date. In this study, we describe trends in DCB use and compare characteristics and in-hospital outcomes between patients who received DCB versus alternative treatments. METHODS: We included patients in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Disease Registry CathPCI Registry who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 2024 and June 2025 and received DCB, drug-eluting stent (DES), or plain old balloon angioplasty. Treatment groups were compared using standard mean differences. RESULTS: Between April 2024 and June 2025, 14 946 DCBs were used in 12 337 patients across 704 CathPCI Registry sites. The monthly rate of DCB use for ISR percutaneous coronary intervention grew from <1% to 17.5% during the study period. Of 96 452 ISR procedures performed overall, 9269 (9.61%) involved the use of DCB. DCB procedures were more likely to involve the use of specialty balloons (DCB 45.3% versus DES 17.5% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 28.3%), intravascular imaging (DCB 54.5% versus DES 35.1% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 30.9%), and atherectomy (DCB 14.9% versus DES 6.0% versus plain old balloon angioplasty 7.3%). Among patients treated with DCB, 0.4% experienced myocardial infarction, 0.7% developed cardiogenic shock, 0.2% had an ischemic stroke, and 0.9% died. DCB was separately used in 3459 of 810 483 (0.43%) non-ISR percutaneous coronary interventions. Unadjusted rates of in-hospital adverse outcomes after ISR and non-ISR DCB use were like those for DES (standard mean difference <10%). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world DCB use is increasing rapidly in the United States, driven by use in ISR lesions but also with growth among non-ISR lesions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalani et al. (2026) conducted an observational in In-stent restenosis (ISR) and non-ISR lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Paclitaxel-coated balloon (AGENT) vs. Drug-eluting stent (DES) or plain old balloon angioplasty was evaluated on In-hospital adverse outcomes (Standard mean difference <10%). Real-world use of paclitaxel-coated balloons for in-stent restenosis grew to 17.5% of procedures, with unadjusted in-hospital adverse outcomes similar to drug-eluting stents (SMD <10%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a056751a550a87e60a1f410https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016625
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evidence on Treating Coronary Artery Disease with Drug-Coated Balloons2025 · 1 citations
  2. 22-055 Drug coated balloons- are they effective in acute angioplasty? A single centre experience2025
  3. 3Real-world comparison of contemporary drug-coated balloons in acute coronary syndrome2025
  4. 4Contemporary Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Angioplasty: A Comprehensive Review2024 · 16 citations
  5. 5Mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon for de novo non-small coronary lesions: a pooled analysis2025 · 1 citations