Demonstrates improved visual speech perception with mirror feedback in healthy adults, suggesting potential benefits for communication strategies.
Previous research has shown that talkers who could see themselves in a mirror were judged to be less intelligible than those who did not have access to real-time visual self-feedback (Casserly & Marino, 2024). However, this finding was specific to acoustic intelligibility; the present study examined the same speech for changes in VISUAL intelligibility by asking naive participants to complete a lipreading discrimination task with visual recordings of the previously analyzed tokens. In those tokens, speakers (N = 13) produced 139 isolated English words with and without mirror feedback. Perceivers (N = 39) were then shown orthographic prompts followed by silent video of a speaker articulating and were asked to indicate whether each word/articulation pair matched. Prompts were either accurate representations of the speech (e.g., “postcard”) or a close phonetic “lure” (e.g., “coast guard”) with minimal segmental differences from the target (mean edit distance 1.3 segments), randomized across trials. Overall accuracy in this lipreading discrimination task was 67.78% (SD = 6.5%), with significantly better performance in response to speech produced in front of a mirror (69.8% vs. 65.7% no-mirror). Although negative effects of a mirror have been observed for acoustic intelligibility, therefore, there appear to be corresponding positive effects on intelligibility in the visual domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casserly et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: