Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates accurate diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients using deep learning models, suggesting improved pathology outcomes.
Background/Objectives: Ovarian epithelial cancers (EOCs) comprise heterogeneous subtypes with distinct clinical outcomes, making accurate histological subtyping essential for prognosis and treatment planning. Although deep learning using digitized hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole-slide images (WSIs) is now widely used, its application to ovarian cancer diagnosis remains limited. Methods: In this multicenter study, we analyzed 319 H&E-stained slides from 152 patients with surgically resected EOC. An attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) framework built on a pathology-specific foundation model (UNI) was used. WSIs were divided into 512 × 512-pixel patches at 40× magnification, and slide-level classification were generated through attention-based aggregation of patch-level feature, followed by patient-level prediction. External validation was performed specifically on the high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Results: The model achieved strong performance, with slide-level and patient-level accuracies of 0.918 and 0.900, respectively, on the test set. In five-fold cross-validation, the mean slide-level AUC was 0.990 (95% CI: 0.983–0.997), and the patient-level AUC was 0.993 (95% CI: 0.989–0.996), indicating consistent results. External validation on TCGA HGSC cases showed robust generalizability, with slide-level and patient-level accuracies of 0.794 and 0.898. F1-scores ranged from 0.832 to 1.000 at the slide-level and from 0.831 to 0.966 at the patient-level, with particularly strong performance for HGSC and clear-cell carcinoma. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of deep learning-based models for histological subtyping of EOC using H&E-stained WSIs. This approach may help pathologists achieve more accurate and consistent histological diagnoses of EOC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: