Randomized trial evaluates pain assessment tool for chronic osteoarthritis in horses, indicating its potential usefulness.
Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent cause of chronic pain and lameness in horses. Whereas lameness can be quantified using objective measures, the assessment of OA-associated pain remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of the Client-Specific Outcome Measure (CSOM), a tool widely used in small animals, for the assessment of chronic OA pain in horses through caretaker evaluation. Methods Seventeen privately owned horses with confirmed OA were enrolled in a 20-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. For each horse, three individual pain-related indicators (CSOM items) were identified through a veterinarian-caretaker consultation. The selected items were regularly scored (0-4), and the scores were summed to obtain a total CSOM score (CSOM-sum). The CSOM-sum was compared with other pain assessment measures, including a caretaker-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-own), a veterinarian-assigned visual analogue scale (VAS-exp), subjective lameness scores, and a gait asymmetry index. Results The CSOM-sum showed moderate but significant correlations with all other pain and lameness measures (rₛ = 0.49-0.60, p < 0.05). In particular, CSOM-sum correlated with gait asymmetry (rₛ = 0.434, p < 0.0001); subgroup analysis revealed a moderate correlation in treated horses (rₛ = 0.4539, p = 0.0025) and a higher correlation in controls (rₛ = 0.5536, p = 0.0006). The VAS-own and VAS-exp scores showed good overall agreement (bias = -4.76 mm; ICC = 0.727; ICC_T = 0.625; ICC_C = 0.838), although with relatively wide limits of agreement. The internal consistency of the CSOM items was high (Cronbach's α = 0.81 overall; α_T = 0.787; α_C = 0.890). Discussion These findings indicate that, provided relevant items are carefully identified, the CSOM may represent a valuable complementary tool for assessing and monitoring pain severity in horses under field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: