PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism0 citations

Association Between SGLT2 Inhibitors and DPP ‐4 Inhibitors Use and Risk of Acute Pancreatitis: Findings From Nationwide Case‐Based Analyses

View Full Paper
YKYe‐Jee KimUlsan CollegeYCYun Kyung ChoUlsan CollegeMKMi‐Sook KimSeoul National University Hospital

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate whether SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) or DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) increase the risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Utilized a nationwide database of Korean health insurance claims from 2018 to 2020.
  • Analyzed 7219 AP cases using conditional logistic regression adjusted for other medications.
  • Applied a case-case-time-control design and conducted a nested case-control study for robustness.
  • The odds ratio for acute pancreatitis associated with SGLT2i use was 0.84 (95% CI 0.52-1.35) indicating negligible risk.
  • The odds ratio for DPP-4i was 0.93 (95% CI 0.75-1.15) suggesting similar negligible risk.
  • Both analyses showed that neither medication is associated with an increased risk of acute pancreatitis.

Abstract

AIMS: The Korean national health insurance claims database was utilised to investigate the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus prescribed DPP-4i or SGLT2i at least once between January, 2018 and December, 2020 were included. AP was defined by ICD-10 code K85.x in either the principal or first additional diagnosis during hospital admission. Prescription status of the anti-diabetic medications was compared between the hazard period (30 days before AP) and the preceding control periods of the same length with 120 days of washout periods, using conditional logistic regression adjusted for other anti-diabetic and AP-related medications. To account for increasing exposure trends, the case-case-time-control design was applied to minimise bias. A nested case-control study was conducted to ensure the robustness of the controls defined within the current type 2 diabetes mellitus cohort. RESULTS: A total of 7219 AP cases were included. In the case-case-time-control analysis, the risk between the AP and SGLT2i (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval 0.84, 0.52-1.35) and DPP-4i (aOR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75-1.15) was negligible. The nested case-control study further supported these findings, as the use of SGLT2i (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.21) or DPP-4i (aOR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.09) within a 30-day time window was not associated with the risk of AP. CONCLUSIONS: Neither SGLT2i nor DPP-4i is associated with an increased risk of AP in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after accounting for prescription trends.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567bca550a87e60a1ff3chttps://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper