Examines intertextual connections in narratives, enhancing biblical interpretation through comparative analysis.
This study explores the intertextual relationship between Plato’s Myth of Er and Luke’s Parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man. It examines how a reader familiar with Plato’s work as an ante-text interprets Luke’s parable. By identifying echoes of the Myth of Er within Luke’s narrative, the reader establishes Plato’s text as the geno-text and Luke’s parable as the pheno-text. Through comparative analysis, the reader discerns thematic and structural commonalities, thereby confirming intertextuality. Contrasting the two narratives further reveals differences, enabling the reader to construct meaning in the pheno-text through the framework of the geno-text. Ultimately, the reader interprets the pheno-text’s message while transcending the geno-text’s influence. This process demonstrates how intertextual reading can enrich biblical interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wookyoung Lee (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: