Examines the influence of country governance on ESG outcomes, suggesting substantial implications for corporate practices.
Using institutional theory, we examine how country governance affects two ESG outcomes: ESG performance and ESG controversies. With Refinitiv/LSEG data for ~146,000 firm‐years in 86 countries (2002–2023) and World Bank WGI, we apply a Mundlak within/between decomposition to test complementarity versus substitution (performance) and prevention versus detection (controversies). Better governance is strongly associated with higher ESG performance—overall and across E, S and G—especially cross‐country. Yet governance also predicts more reported controversies, consistent with detection/visibility rather than worse conduct. Instrumental Variable and DiD tests corroborate these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulo Francisco (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: