This analysis reviews legal outcomes of civil transactions violating formal and authentication requirements, suggesting reforms for better compliance.
Under civil law, the form of a transaction is considered one of the constitutive elements for the validity of a civil transaction when required by law. Not all violations of formal, notarization, and authentication requirements in civil transactions give rise to legal consequences. The 2015 Civil Code of Vietnam adopts a more flexible approach than earlier versions, notably through Article 129, which introduces a “remedial mechanism” allowing civil transactions to be upheld if one party has fulfilled at least two-thirds of their obligations. This article analyses the current Vietnamese civil law regulations regarding civil transactions that do not comply with form requirements and notarization/authentication procedures, and examines the shortcomings in their practical enforcement. Based on this analysis, the authors propose legal reforms to strike a balance between adherence to form and notarization, authentication procedures requirements, and voluntariness in civil transactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Son et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: