Robotics integration across manufacturing, healthcare, and hazardous environments demands robust performance evaluation. This study proposes a comprehensive Task–Environment–System–Metric (TESM) framework to link operational tasks and environmental constraints with quantifiable metrics. Based on TESM, a multi-level evaluation system is established, covering kinematic/dynamic performance, perception, human–robot interaction (HRI), reliability, and lifecycle economics. We systematically review key evaluation methodologies, including mechanistic modeling, digital twin simulation, physical testing, and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). Furthermore, typical engineering applications—ranging from industrial manipulators and mobile robots to collaborative and field systems are analyzed to demonstrate practical implementation. Despite significant progress, challenges persist regarding unified standards, testing fidelity, and the “black box” nature of data-driven assessments in safety-critical scenarios. This review concludes by identifying future research directions, such as establishing benchmark testing platforms, improving lifecycle assessment schemes, and developing modular evaluation tools. These advancements aim to ensure the scalable and reliable deployment of robotic systems in complex engineering environments.
Wei et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: