Demonstrates improved memory efficiency in LiDAR-inertial odometry for autonomous systems, indicating significant advantages for extended operations.
This paper proposes DB-LIO (database-driven LiDAR-inertial odometry), a simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system that addresses memory scalability challenges in extended autonomous operation. Existing LiDAR-SLAM systems accumulate keyframe history in memory, leading to O(N) growth and out-of-memory failures during extended operation. To overcome this limitation, DB-LIO introduces three core design elements. First, it proposes a spatially indexed keyframe management scheme that persistently stores keyframes in SQLite with R-Tree spatial indexing, enabling O(logN+k) spatial queries that tightly couple cache eviction with factor-graph optimization requirements—a design that ensures every keyframe potentially involved in the next optimization cycle resides in cache. Second, it presents a four-level memory bounding architecture—SLAM-engine keyframe trimming with transparent on-demand reloading, a DB-level least recently used (LRU) cache with a spatial active window, Scan Context descriptor pool bounding, and iSAM2 sliding window compaction with a sparse global anchor graph—that collectively bounds the dominant memory consumers to O(C). Third, the DB-based persistent storage enables a localization mode that can reload previously built maps—including full point clouds, six-degree-of-freedom poses, timestamps, and inter-keyframe relationships—and perform pose estimation using the stored map, which is particularly valuable for agricultural robots and other autonomous systems requiring map reuse. Experiments on a custom orchard dataset demonstrate an 81.9% reduction in memory usage compared with that of the in-memory baseline (2888 MB → 524 MB), while preserving equivalent trajectory accuracy (absolute trajectory error (ATE) root mean square error (RMSE) 0.305 ± 0.001 m vs. 0.296 m). Validation on the KITTI odometry benchmark confirms that the proposed localization mode generalizes across different LiDAR types (Livox Mid360, Velodyne HDL-64E) and environments (orchard, urban driving).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: