Key result
Widespread TRI-SCORE adoption identifies ~60% of evaluated patients as intermediate or high risk.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the global uptake of the TRI-SCORE digital tools and describe the clinical characteristics of patients considered for tricuspid regurgitation intervention.
What are the clinical characteristics of patients evaluated globally using the TRI-SCORE digital tool for severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=36,001)
Yes
What are the clinical characteristics of patients evaluated globally using the TRI-SCORE digital tool for severe tricuspid regurgitation?
The TRI-SCORE digital tool has seen widespread global adoption, revealing that a majority of evaluated patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation present with advanced, highly symptomatic disease.
Reveals advanced symptomatic TR in most global TRI-SCORE users; leaves open whether tool use improves risk stratification or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The TRI-SCORE is a dedicated risk-stratification tool for patients with isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) that is freely accessible via a web-based platform or mobile application. AIMS: To evaluate the global uptake of the TRI-SCORE and to describe the clinical characteristics of patients considered for intervention. METHODS: We collected all TRI-SCORE calculations and related parameters entered by users into the web-based calculator or mobile application between June 2024 and June 2025, along with the users' geographic location. The clinical profiles derived from these data were compared with those of the TRIGISTRY cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 36,001 calculations were recorded across 117 countries, with 83% performed through the web-based platform. Most patients were aged≥70 years (70%), 58% were women and 70% had atrial fibrillation or flutter. TR was functional in 73% of cases. Patients were generally severely symptomatic (58% in New York Heart Association class III-IV, 58% with right heart failure signs) and many presented with advanced disease stages, with 33% and 27% falling into intermediate (4-5 points) and high (≥6 points) TRI-SCORE categories, respectively. Patient profiles were broadly consistent with those in TRIGISTRY, although left ventricular, hepatic and renal dysfunction were less commonly encountered. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the widespread adoption of the TRI-SCORE through free, user-friendly digital platforms and suggest its potential utility as a tool to monitor disease stage when considering interventions in patients with TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dreyfus et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Isolated severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=36,001). TRI-SCORE digital tools vs. TRIGISTRY cohort was evaluated on Global uptake and clinical characteristics of patients considered for intervention. Analysis of 36,001 TRI-SCORE calculations across 117 countries showed widespread adoption, with 33% and 27% of patients falling into intermediate and high-risk categories, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: