Why the study?
Discharge planning is integral to patient flow, and predicting discharge outcomes is crucial to help healthcare providers anticipate patient needs and resource requirements.
How are statistical methods and machine learning tools utilized in the literature to predict patient discharge outcomes?
How are statistical methods and machine learning tools utilized in the literature to predict patient discharge outcomes?
Both machine learning and statistical methods are widely and almost equally used in the literature to predict patient discharge outcomes, which is essential for optimizing hospital resource planning.
Nearly equal adoption of ML and statistical methods informs discharge prediction for resource planning; leaves open comparative performance trials.
Discharge planning is integral to patient flow as delays can lead to hospital-wide congestion. Because a structured discharge plan can reduce hospital length of stay while enhancing patient satisfaction, this topic has caught the interest of many healthcare professionals and researchers. Predicting discharge outcomes, such as destination and time, is crucial in discharge planning by helping healthcare providers anticipate patient needs and resource requirements. This article examines the literature on the prediction of various discharge outcomes. Our review discovered papers that explore the use of prediction models to forecast the time, volume, and destination of discharged patients. Of the 101 reviewed papers, 49.5% looked at the prediction with machine learning tools, and 50.5% focused on prediction with statistical methods. The fact that knowing discharge outcomes in advance affects operational, tactical, medical, and administrative aspects is a frequent theme in the papers studied. Furthermore, conducting system-wide optimization, predicting the time and destination of patients after discharge, and addressing the primary causes of discharge delay in the process are among the recommendations for further research in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pahlevani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: