PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2006Limnology and Oceanography164 citations

Different reactions of Southern Ocean phytoplankton size classes to iron fertilization

View Full Paper
LHL. HoffmannIPIlka PeekenKLKarin Lochte

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

During the European Iron Fertilisation Experiment (EIFEX), performed in the Southern Ocean, we investigated the reactions of different phytoplankton size classes to iron fertilization, applying measurements of size fractionated pigments, particulate organic matter, microscopy, and flow cytometry. Chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentrations at 20-m depth increased more than fivefold following fertilization through day 26, while concentrations of particulate organic carbon (POC), nitrogen (PON), and phosphorus (POP) roughly doubled through day 29. Concentrations of Chl a and particulate organic matter decreased toward the end of the experiment, indicating the demise of the iron-induced phytoplankton bloom. Despite a decrease in total diatom biomass at the end of the experiment, biogenic particulate silicate (bPSi) concentrations increased steadily due to a relative increase of heavily silicified diatoms. Although diatoms >10 µm were the main beneficiaries of iron fertilization, the growth of small diatoms (2-8 mm) was also enhanced, leading to a shift from a haptophyte- to a diatom-dominated community in this size fraction. The total biomass had lower than Redfield C : N, N : P, and C : P ratios but did not show significant trends after iron fertilization. This concealed various alterations in the elemental composition of the different size fractions. The microplankton (>20 µm) showed decreasing C : N and increasing N : P and C : P ratios, possibly caused by increased N uptake and the consumption of cellular P pools. The nanoplankton (2-20 µm) showed almost constant C : N and decreasing N : P and C : P ratios. Our results suggest that the latter is caused by a shift in composition of taxonomic groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffmann et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05c1adb6b31dc090346f9bhttps://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.3.1217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phytoplankton Community Structure and the Drawdown of Nutrients and CO 2 in the Southern Ocean1999 · 811 citations
  2. 2Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik1958 · 5,627 citations
  3. 3Nitrous oxide measurements during EIFEX, the European Iron Fertilization Experiment in the subpolar South Atlantic Ocean2005 · 50 citations
  4. 4lron transport in marine phytoplankton: Kinetics of cellular and medium coordination reactions1990 · 402 citations
  5. 5Iron deficiency limits phytoplankton growth in Antarctic waters1990 · 773 citations